Contract Manufacturer Evaluations:

A Strategic Power Tool for Long-Term Improvement

Can you think of a single downside to making your good contract manufacturer even better? And by better, we mean on a whole range of fronts, including:

Stellar service levels

Lower risks through enhanced clarity and communication

Working exclusively with the most trustworthy and dependable partners

Improved alignment with your priorities and business goals

Increasingly streamlined processes for higher efficiency, faster delivery and better logistics models.

Greater proactivity in sharing opportunities for everything from cost cuts to product innovations

The list goes on. So, if performance evaluations – those power tools that belong in every manufacturer’s toolbox – are so beneficial, why are they also so neglected?

Hammering in a nail with a screwdriver

Even the best tools are ineffectual if they are used improperly or simply lay about gathering dust. Likewise, performance evaluations are too frequently underrated, underused or misunderstood by manufacturers who:


Don’t conduct them at all


Outsource evaluations to auditors or other third parties after things go wrong, thereby identifying problems way too late in the game


Limit themselves to informal or unstructured evaluations denying both parties the full benefits


Leave out a follow-up plan

Evaluations in 4 easy steps

Granted, evaluations take work, but everything has a starting point. The starting point for performance evaluations is answering four questions:


Answers will vary somewhat from manufacturer to manufacturer (depending on everything from business goals to performance to company culture) and even from project to project.

What do you care about?

Before you can measure success, you need to know what success looks like. If your team is not aligned or, worse still, you are not crystal clear on your own expectations, even the best intentions and hardest work can produce catastrophic results. Think of it as everyone jumping into their cars and driving at full speed…to different destinations.

Here are a few tips to prevent that from happening.

  1. Start with the basic project requirements: cost, quality, delivery timelines, technical capabilities, etc.
  2. Include requirements that will work towards your strategic goals. For example, how well your CM works with your teams.
  3. Don’t force your CM to give equal attention to dozens of demands when you need them to focus on a critical subset.
  4. Write them down. Make certain everyone involved understands what you care about.

How will it be measured?

The second step to defining success is to remove all subjectivity from individual requirements. There is little point in telling four people you expect “high quality” if each one has their own definitions of “high” and “quality”.

Metrics – assigning numerical values to your goals – are a fair and effective way to register performance. For example, one metric for quality might be the number of rejected or returned devices per batch.

Assigning helpful metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) could fill its own blog. However, the following tips will keep you from making costly mistakes:

  1. Formalize your KPIs by putting them in your contract, SLAs, etc. and have your CM sign off on them.
  2. Use metrics for prioritized ‘soft’ goals as well. Too many companies ignore vital strategic requirements simply because “good service” or “good working relationship with team” feels innately subjective. However, there are still fair ways to measure these. For example, if your CM takes more than 48 hours to respond to your messages or complaints from your team are way above an acceptable monthly threshold.
  3. Ensure the goals you set are reasonable. For instance, evaluating your CM on whether they can meet impossible deadlines sets them for failure and damage both of you in the long term.

When, how and to whom will you communicate results?

There is little point to keeping any findings to yourself; you have to let your CM know how well (or badly) they’ve met your expectations.

The ‘when’ can vary. Generally, a new CM may require more frequent feedback as you both find your collaborative groove. As for the ‘how’:

  1. Go over the goals you both agreed upon, using your objective metrics to score performance.
  2. Make it a conversation – you are building a partnership, not grading a student.
  3. Remember that the point of an evaluation is continuous improvement, whether it’s fixing issues or building strengths.
  4. Work together to form a detailed, going-forward plan.
  5. Put the plan in writing, making updates to your contract if necessary.

How will you guide your CM to do better?

Communication is key to any relationship and critical to a successful manufacturer-CM partnership. Without clear and frequent communication, you open yourself to a number of risks, from delayed reactions to delaying actions based on misunderstanding.

Lead by example and guide for growth by:

  1. Ensuring that the going-forward plan is detailed and crystal clear.
  2. That all areas of concern have deadlines for the desired outcomes.
  3. Including frequent checkpoints to track progress across KPIs & expectations and, if necessary, correct direction sooner rather than later.
  4. Establishing clear communication standards to ensure updates are shared across all stakeholder levels and disciplines.

Final Word

Evaluations are keys to a better future; ways to reap even greater rewards from your working relationship. A CM determined to do their best for you,  proactively provides updates, requests feedback and welcomes formal evaluations as an opportunity to continuously level up.

Curious about the steps Providence takes to ace its evaluations? Contact us {link}to find out more.

Would you like a copy of this post to share?

Other Featured Resources

Relationship Advice for Manufacturers

February 23, 2022

Read More

How CM Expertise Helps You Control Costs

February 22, 2022

Read More

Breaking down Walls

February 21, 2022

Read More

Make vs Buy

February 20, 2022

Read More

Strategies for Continuity

October 14, 2021

Read More

How to tell whether Providence is… or isn’t… the perfect fit CM for you

September 23, 2021

Read More

Intellectual Property: How to Protect Your Big Ideas in a Global Supply Chain

September 9, 2021

Read More

Dispelling Myths About Doing Business in China

August 26, 2021

Read More

(Net)Working Wonders

August 16, 2021

Read More

A Spectrum of Possibilities

August 14, 2021

Read More

Too Big, Too Small or Just Right: A Guide to Finding Your Perfect Fit Contract Manufacturer

August 13, 2021

Read More

10 Dimensions of Excellence

May 21, 2021

Read More

Ten ‘Must-Haves’ for Medical Device Manufacturers

May 19, 2021

Read More

How CM-Enabled Transparency Reduces Risk and Improves Your Medical Device Supply Chain

May 16, 2021

Read More

At What Stage of a Product’s Lifecycle Should You Bring in a CM Partner?

March 11, 2021

Read More

Causes, Costs and Cures for Unplanned Downtime

March 4, 2021

Read More

The Many Hats of an Integrated Contract Manufacturer

February 17, 2021

Read More

Leverage Key Suppliers for Consolidation

December 9, 2020

Read More

The Importance of Choosing the Right Plastic

November 18, 2020

Read More

Medical Device Contract Manufacturing — When Less is More

October 18, 2019

Read More

About Providence Enterprise

Providence Enterprise is a Hong Kong medical device contract manufacturer of Class I and II medical devices with manufacturing in China & Vietnam. We specialize in electro-mechanical assemblies and high-volume disposables. We are FDA registered and ISO 13485, ISO 14971, ISO 14001, ISO 27001 certified. Our capabilities include fabricating tooling for silicone rubber and injection molded plastics, clean room injection molding, electronics, clean room assembly, and sterilization.